نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The present study aims to determe teachers’ professional qualifications in “the learning approach to knowing” and offer executive strategies for realization of this approach. In this research an exploratory mixed-method research was employed. The population in the qualitative phase of the research consisted of experts of education and in the quantitative phase included all high school teachers of Districts 2 and 3 of Isfahan. The purposive sampling technique was used in order to select participants in both phases. In the qualitative phase, 20 experts were employed using the chain purposive sampling method, and in the quantitative phase, teachers with MA/MSc and PhD degrees in Isfahan were selected. The data collection instruments included semi-structured interviews in the qualitative phase and a researcher-made questionnaire with 14 scales of professional qualifications for teachers in the quantitative phase. The qualitative findings were analyzed suing content analysis of interviews, and quantitative findings were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
کلیدواژهها English
Adler, R, W., & Milne, M. J. (1995). Increasing learner-control and reflection: towards learning-to-learn in an undergraduate management accounting course. Accounting Education 4 (2): 105-119.
Avanzo, D. C. (2003). Application of research 7. On learning to college teaching: ecological examples. Sciences, 53, 1121-1128.
Burnett, G. (2002). Learning to Learn: Making learning work for all students. Carmarthen: Crown House.
Candy, P. C. (1987). Evolution, revolution or devolution: increasing learner control in the instructional setting. In Appreciating Adults Lecrrrzing: Froril the Learners' Perspective (edited by D. J. Boud and V. Griffin), London: Kogan Page.
Choudhury, S. R., & Chowdhury, S. R. (2015). Teaching Competency of Secondary Teacher Educators In Relation To Their Metacognition Awarness. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 4 (1): 17-23.
Costa, A. L., & Lowery, L. F. (1989). Techniques for teaching thinking. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Creswell, J. Mixed methods research, G. Cizek (Ed), Handbook of educational policy, Academic Press, 2003.
Greene, J. (2007). Employing mixed method in evaluation, Paper Presented at Centers for Disease Control- American Evaluation Association, Summer Evaluation Institue.
Crow, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology. CBE Life Sci Educ7,368-381.
Delors, J. (2013). ERF Paper No. 4: Revisiting Learning: The Treasure Within- Assessing the influence of the 1996 “Delors Report”. French.
Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Elestad, E., & Christophersen, K, A. (2017). Perceptions of Digital Competency among Student Teachers: Contributing to the Development of Student Teachers’ Instructional Self-Efficacy in Technology-Rich Classrooms. Educ. Sci, 7, 27.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive mentoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
Hewson, P. W. (1996). Teaching for conceptual change. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & B. J. Fraser (Eds), Improving Teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 131-140). New York: Teachers College.
Higgins, S, K., Wall, V., Baumfield, E., Hall, D., & Leat, Woolner, P. (2007). Learning to Learn in Schools Phase 3 evaluation year three final report. London: Campaign for Learning.
Kimberly, D. T. (2012). Promoting Student Metacognition. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11, 113-120.
Koutselini, M. (1997) Contemporary trends and perspectives of the curricula: towards a meta-modern paradigm for curriculum, Curriculum Studies, 5, 87-101.
Krippendorff, Kh. (2003). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.
Lao, Hendrik A.E., Kaipatty, Gres Jekstman. da Costa Jeronimo, Agapito (2017). A Study on Teachers’ Competency In Teaching English At SMA Negeri.The 3 rd International seminar on Education and Technology– ISET.collaborative Graduate schools conference.
Leat, D., & Lin, M. E. I. (2003). Developing pedagogy of metacognition and transfer: Some signposts for the generation and use of knowledge and the creation of research partnerships. British Educational Research Journal, 29 (3), 3830414.
Leutwyler, B. (2009). Metacognitive learning strategies: Diff erential development patterns in high school. Metacognition and Learning, 4 (2): 111-123.
Leutwyler, B., & Maag Merki, K. (2009). School eff ects on students’ self-regulated learning. A multivariate analysis of the relationship between individual perceptions of school processes and cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational dimensions of self-regulated learning. Journal for Educational Research Online, 1 (1): 197-223.
Lingard, B., Wayne Martino, M, M., & Mark, B. (2002). Addressing the Educational Needs of Boys. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training.
Marzano, R. J. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and conative considerations in classroom assessment. In N. M. Lambert & B. L.
Meichenbaum, D. (1986). Metacognitive methods of instruction: Current Status and future prospects. In M. Schwebel & C. A. Maher (Eds), Facilitating cognitive development: International perspectives, programs, and practices (pp. 23-32). New York: The Haworth Press.
Mishra, P. M., & Koehler, J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 6, 1017-1054.
NRC. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educ Res, 18, 16-25.
Persichitte, K. A. (1993). Instructional strategies for metacognitive development: An inservice design. Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology sponsored by the Research and Theory Division, New Orleans, LA.
Pintrich, P. R. (1990). Implications of psychological research on student learning and college teaching for teacher education. In W. R.
Plano Clark, V., Creswell, J., O, Neil green, D., & Shope, R. (2008). Mixing quantitative and qualitative approaches: An introduction to emergent mixed method research, In: S. Hesse- Biber & P. Leavy.
Raynal, F., & Rieunier, A. (1997). Pedagogie: dictionnaire des concepts cles. Paris: ESF.
Rodd, J. (2001). Learning to Learn in schools: Phase 1 project research report. London: Campaign for Learning.
Rosite, T, B. (1999). The Knowledge Bases of the Expert Teacher. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 1.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
Smith, A., Lovatt, M., & Turner, J. (2009). Learning to Learn in practice: The L2L approach. Carmarthen: Crown House. Stenhouse, L. 1981. What counts as research? British Journal of Educational Studies, 29, 2, 103-14.
Spector, J. M., Klein, J. D., Reiser, R. A., Sims, R. C., Grabowski, B. L., & De la Teja, I. (2006). Competencies and standards for instructional design and educational technology. Invited discussion paper for Itforum. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from http: // it. coe. uga. edu/itforum/paper89/ITForumpaper89.pdf.
Strang, J., Masterson, P., & Button, O. (2006). Attitudes, skills and knowledge: How to teach Learning to Learn in the secondary school. Carmarthen: Crown House. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1989. UN General Assembly Resolution 44/25. http://www2. ohchr. org/english/law/crc. Htm
Straus, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). “Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory”, Third Edition, Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Sundem. G. L., Williams, D. Z., & Chironna, J. F. (1990). The revolution in accounting education. Management Acc, ounting (IMA), 72 (6), 49-53.
Terry, P. R. (1997). Habermas and Education: knowledge, communication, discourse, Curriculum Studies, 5, 269-279.
UNESCO Report. (2011). ICT competency framework for teachers, Retrieved May 6, 2012 from http: //unesdoc. unesco. org/images/0021/002134/213475e. pdf
Wen, Ya-Hui. (2012). A Study on Metacognition of College Teachers. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 8, 1.
Williamsonsn, S. N. (2007). Development of a self- rating scale of self-directed learning. Nurse researcher, 14 (2): 66-83.
