حقوردی، مجید. (1393) ویژگیهای مسائل کلامی ریاضی در دوره راهنمایی و راهکارهای فرایند تسهیل حل آنها. دو فصلنامه نظریه و عمل در برنامه درسی. انجمن مطالعات برنامه درسی و دانشگاه خوارزمی. 25.2-46.
Berends, I. E., & van Lieshout, E. C. D. M. (2009). The effect of illustrations in arithmetic problem-solving: Effects of increased cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 19, 45–353.
Booth, R., & Thomas, M. (2000). Visualization in mathematics learning: arithmetic problem-solving and student difficulties. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(2), 169–190.
Cai, J., & Lester, F. K. (2005). Solution representations and pedagogical representations in Chinese and U.S. classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 221–237.
Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14 (1), 101-120.
Csilos, S. Szitanyi, J. Kelemen, R. (2012). The effects of using drawings in developing young children’s mathematical word problem solving: A design experiment with third-grade Hungarian students. . Educational Studies in Mathematics; 81:47-65.
Diezmann, C. M. (2005). Primary students’ knowledge of the properties of spatially-oriented diagrams. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education; (pp. 281–288). Melbourne: PME.
Diezmann, C., & English, L. (2001). Promoting the use of diagrams as tools for thinking. In A. Cuoco, & F. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics: 2001 YearBook (pp. 1–23). Virginia: NCTM.
Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Designing research-based instruction for story problems. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 267–296.
Gagatsis, A., & Elia, E. (2004). The effects of different modes of representation on mathematical problem solving. In M. J. Hoines, & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group of the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol. 2 (pp. 447–454). Bergen: PME.
Hembree, R. (1992). Experiments and relational studies in problem solving-a metaanalysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 242–273.
Hurely, S., & Novick, L. (2010). Solving problems using matrix, network, and heirachy diagrams: The consequences of violating construction. The Qurantery Journal of Expremental Psychology. 63(2). 275-290.
Munez, D., Orrantia, J., & Rosales, J. (2013). The effect of external representations on compare word problems: Supporting mental model construction. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 337–355.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, Va: The Author.
Novick, L., & Hurley, M. (2001). To matrix, network, or hierarchy: That is the question. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 158–216.
Novick, L. R. (2006). Understanding spatial diagram structure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1826–1856.
Novick, L. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 510–520.
Pantziara, M. & Gagatsis, A. & Elia, I. (2009). Using diagrams as tools for the solution of non-routine mathematical problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 72, 39–60.
English, L. (1996). Children’s construction of mathematical knowledge in solving novel isomorphic problems in concrete and written form. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 81–112.
Fagnant, A & Vlassis. J. (2013). Schematic representations in arithmetical problem solving: Analysis of their impact on grade 4 students. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 84, 149-168.
Goldin, G. A., & Kaput, J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning and doing mathematics. In L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 397–430). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684–689.
Ke, F & Clark, K. (2018). Game-Based multimodel representations and Mathematical Problem solving, International of Science and Mathematics Education. 17, 21-35.
Klein, A. S., Beishuisen, M., & Treffers, A. (1998). The empty number line in Dutch second grade: Realistic versus gradual program design. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29 (4), 443-464.
Lesh, R., Behr, M., Post, T. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics, (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sierpinska, A. (1992). On understanding the notion of function. In E. Dubinsky, & G. Harel (Ed.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 25-58). USA: Mathematical Association of America.
Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E., & Ichikawa, S. (2007). What kinds of perceptions and daily learning behaviors promote students’ use of diagrams in mathematics problem solving? Learning and Instruction, 17, 322– 335.
Van Meter, P., Aleksic, M., Schwartz, A., & Garner, J. (2006). Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 142–166.
Van Meter, P., & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 285–325.
Van Garderen, D., & Montague, M. (2003). Visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Learning Disabilities & Research, 18, 246254.
Vekiri, I. (2002). What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 261–312.
Munez, D., Orrantia, J., & Rosales, J. (2013). The effect of external representations on compare word problems: Supporting mental model construction. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 337–355.
Willis, G., & Fuson, K. C. (1998). Teaching Children to use Schematic Drawing to solve addition and subtraction word Problems. Journal of Educational Psychology. 80 (2), 192-201.
)