- داماسیو، آنتونیو (1391) در جستجوی اسپینوزا، شادی، اندوه و مغز با احساس، ترجمۀ رضا امیری، تهران: نشر مهرویستا.
- دهانه، استانیسلاس (1394) آگاهی و مغز، ترجمۀ صباغی پور، تهران: نشر ارجمند.
- سرل، جان (1392) درآمدی کوتاه به ذهن، ترجمۀ محمد یوسفی، تهران: نشر نی.
- سیف، علی‌اکبر (1383) اندازه‌گیری، سنجش و ارزشیابی آموزشی، تهران: نشر دوران.
- شعبانی ورکی، بختیار (1385) منطق پژوهش در علوم تربیتی و اجتماعی جهت‌گیری‌های نوین، مشهد: به نشر.
- شعبانی ورکی، بختیار (1386) رئالیسم استعلایی و ثنویت کاذب در پژوهش تربیتی، فصلنامة نوآوری‌های آموزشی، س 6، ش 20: 66 – 86.
- خاتمی، محمود (1387) فلسفۀ ذهن، تهران: نشر علم.
- خادمی زارع، حسن و فخرزاد، محمدباقر (1392) تلفیق مدیریت مشارکتی و سیستم‌های فازی برای ارزیابی عملکرد آموزشی دانشجویان، فصلنامۀ پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی در آموزش عالی، ش 69: 23 -40.
-حقانی، محمود (1376) کاربرد منطق فازی در ارزشیابی پیشرفت تحصیلی، فصلنامۀ تعلیم و تربیت، ش 50: 53 -68.
- چرچلند، پاول (1391)؛ ماده و آگاهی، ترجمۀ امیر غلامی، تهران: نشر مرکز.
- گال، مردیت و دیگران (1387) روش‌های تحقیق کمی و کیفی در علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، چاپ اول، ترجمۀ احمدرضا نصر و دیگران، تهران: سمت.
- هوارد جونز، پاول (1390) علوم اعصاب، علوم تربیتی و مغز، ترجمۀ سید کمال خرازی، تهران: سمت.
Andrieu, Bernard (2006). Brains in the Flesh: Prospects for a Neurophenomenology. Janus Head, 9(1), 135-155. by Trivium Publications, Amherst, NY. Printed in the United States of America
Bayne, Tim (2004). Closing the Gap? Some Questions for Neurophenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3(4), 349-64.
Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1992). Theory into practice: How do we link? In T. M.Duffy, & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. (pp. 17-34)
Bhaskar, R. (1989) Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. London, Verso.
Bussey, M. (2009). Causal layered pedagogy: Rethinking curricula practice. Journal of Futures Studies, 13(3), 19-32.
Calidoni-Lundberg, Federica (2006). Evaluation: definitions, methods and models An ITPS framework. Swedish Institute For Growth Policy Studies. Östersund, July 2006
Churchland, Patricia Smith. (2002). Brain-Wise: studies in neurophilosophy. The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts. London, England
Cilliers, P. )1998(. Complexity and Postmodernism. Understanding complex systems. First Published London: Routledge.
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2002). Constructivist discourses and the field of education: Problems and possibilities. Educational Theory, 52(4), 409–4
Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2000). Engaging minds: Changing teaching in complex times (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Fourali, C. (1997). Using fuzzy logic in educational measurement: The case of portfolio assessment. Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(3), 129-148.
Gallagher, Shaun & Lindgren, Robb (2015). Enactive Metaphors: Learning Through Full-Body Engagement. Educ Psychol Rev 27:391–404
Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Gidley, J and Hampson, G.(2008). 'Integral perspectives on school educational futures' in M. Bussey, S. Inayatullah and I. Milojevic (ed.) Alternative Educational Futures: Pedagogies for an Emergent World, Sense Publications, Rotterdam, pp. 253-268.
Graham, Heidi H.(2010). Leadership as Co-influencing: A Heuristic Narrative Study of Dynamic Co-emergence Within the Leadership Relationship, A Dissertation Submitted to The Faculty of The Graduate School of Education and Human Development of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education.
Guba, E. G.; Lincoln, Y. S.(1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London: Sage,
E. S.(2007). Integral Teacher, Integral Students, Integral Classroom:
Applying Integral Theory to Education,pp(1-42).
https:// academia.edu.documents/6424855/integral-education-esbjornhargens.pdf
House, R.Ernest.(2016). The Role of Values and Evaluation in Thinking. American Journal of Evaluation. Vol. 37(1)104-108
House (1994). The future perfect of evaluation, Evaluation Practice, Vol. 15, 239-247.
Inayatullah, Sohail. (2004).The Causal Layered Analysis (CLA) Reader Theory and Case Studies of an Integrative and Transformative Methodology. Published by Tamkang University Press
Inayatullah, Sohail. (1998). Causal Layered Analysis: Poststructuralism as method. Futures, Vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 815–829.
Ingersoll, R. Elliott.(2007) Perspectives and Psychotherapy: Applying Integral Theory To Psychotherapy Practice. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology., Vol. 39 Issue 2, p175-198. 24p.
Ingoley, S. & Bakal, J.W. (2012). Use of fuzzy logic in evaluating students’ learning achievement. International Journal on Advanced Computer Engineering and Communication Technology, 1(2), 47-56.
Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langlitz, Nicolas. (2015). On a not so chance encounter of neurophilosophy and science studies in a sleep laboratory. History of the Human Sciences,Vol.28(4) 3–24
McInerney, R. G (2013). Neurophenomenological Praxis: Its Applications to Learning and Pedagogy. S. Gordon (Ed.), Neurophenomenology and Its Applications to Psychology, Springer Science+Business Media New York. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7239-1_2
McGuigan, Pratt & Katzev (2000). Measuring program outcomes: Retro-spective pretest methodology. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(3), 341-349.
Mohr (1999). The qualitative method of impact analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 20(1), 69-84.
Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5-12.
Prawat, R. S., & Floden, R. E. (1994). Philosophical perspectives on constructivist views of learning. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 37-48.
Qing Li, Bruce Clark and Ian Winchester (2010). Instructional design and technology grounded in enactivism: A paradigm shift?. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol 41 No 3. 403–419.
Scriven, M. (1983). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Shabani V. Bakhtiar, Robert E. Floden & Javidi K. Tahereh (2015) Para-quantitative Methodology: Reclaiming experimentalism in educational research, Open Review of Educational Research, 2:1, 26-41
Shadish, W. R. (1998). Evaluation theory is who we are. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 1-19.
Sheppard, Shelby L.(2001). Does Mind Matter? Education and Conception of Mind. Educational Theory. V5 1. N 2.243-258.
Slevitch, Lisa. (2011) Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies Compared: Ontological and Epistemological Perspectives, Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 12:1, 73-81,
Stern, Elliot (2004). Philosophies and types of evaluation research, Descy, P.; Tessaring, M. (eds), The foundations of evaluation and impact research Third report on vocational training research in Europe: background report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thompson, E. & Varela.F (2001). Radical Embodiment: Neural Dynamics and Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5/10:418-425
Van Geert, Paul.Steenbeek, H. (2008). Understanding mind, brain, and education as a complex, dynamic developing system: Measurement, modeling, and research. In The Educated Brain: Essays in Neuroeducation. (Editors)A. M. Battro, K. W. Fischer, & P. J. Le´na. Cambridge University Press.
Varela, F. J., & Shear, J. (1999). First-person methodologies: What, why, how? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6 (2–3), 1–14.
F.(1996). Neuro Phenomenology a Methodological Remedy To The Hard Problem, Journal Of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330-349
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press..
Voskoglous, M.V. (2013). Fuzzy logic as a tool for assessing students’ knowledge and skills. Education Sciences, 3(2), 208-221. doi:10.3390/edusci3020208.
Zorn, D. M. (2011) Enactive Education: Dynamic Co-Emergence, Complexity, Experience, and the Embodied Mind. A thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Graduate Department of Theory and Policy Studies Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. University of Toronto. Not printed.
)