واکاوی و تبیین ماهیت و مبانی برنامه درسی هم افزا(سینرژیک)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم تربیتی و برنامه درسی دانشگاه علوم و تحقیقات

2 دانشگاه فرهنگیان

3 گروه علوم تربیتی و برنامه درسی دانشگاه خوارزمی

چکیده

هدف این مقاله، تشریح هویت برنامه درسی هم افزا از طریق توصیف دو بخش برنامه درسی صامت و برنامه درسی ناطق، وجوه درونی و بیرونی برنامه درسی است. همچنین به تبیین  مبانی و ویژگی‎ها برنامه درسی هم‎افزا می پردازد. رویکرد مورد استفاده  کیفی و از نوع سنتز پژوهی است و به کمک فرا ترکیب این پژوهش انجام شد . جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل کلیه کتاب ها، مقالات، و پژوهش های حوزه هم افزایی در برنامه درسی و آموزش است. نتایج این تحلیل و سپس ترکیب آنها، چارچوب مفهومی را در حوزه برنامه درسی با محوریت هم افزایی شکل دادند تا ماهیت تعاملی، مشارکت جویانه، روییدنی، ارزشمندی تفاوت ها، تلفیقی و فرآیند محوری و مبانی فلسفی، روانشناسی، هنری، فنآوری، علمی و کل گرایانه را مطرح نمایند. از ویژگی های آن می توان به رهاسازی پتانسیل ها، خودشکوفایی، هم نوایی اجتماعی و دیدن معلم به عنوان بخشی از برنامه درسی اشاره نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Nature and Foundation of Synergistic Curriculum

نویسندگان [English]

  • nahid hashemi 1
  • nematollah mousapour 2
  • Ali Hosseinikhah 3
1 Department of Educational Sciences and Curriculum of the University of Science and Research
2 Department of Educational Sciences and Curriculum of Farhangian University
3 Department of Educational Sciences and Curriculum of Kharazmi University
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to explain the identity of the synergistic curriculum through the description of two parts of the silent curriculum and the talking curriculum, the internal and external aspects of the curriculum. It also helps to explain the foundation and features of the synergistic curriculum. The approach used in this study included discretional qualitative research synthesis which was fulfilled through metasynthesis. The total corpus for this study included books, essays and studies in education and synergy. A conceptual framework was then formed based on the results for curriculum focuses on synergy to provide an interactive, communicative, valued difference, synthesis, processing and philosophical basis, psychology, artistic, technological, scientific, and holistic. The features include the release of potentials, self-actualization, social co-operation, and teacher's seeing as part of the curriculum.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Synergistic Curriculum based on synergy
  • Synergy
  • Integration
  • Interaction and self -actualization
حسینی خواه، علی(1392). سیمور برنارد سرسون، دانشنامه ایرانی برنامه درسی.
رابینز، استیفن پی. و دیسنزو، دیوید ای. (1382)مبانی مدیریت، ترجمه سیدمحمد اعرابی، محمدعلی حمیدرفیعی، بهروزاسراری ارشاد، تهران، دفتر پژوهشهای فرهنگی.
زاهدی، شمس السادات.(1389): تجزیه و تحلیل و طراحی سیستم ها، تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
شورت، ادموند سی (1991). روش شناسی مطالعات برنامه درسی. ترجمه محمود مهرمحمدی و همکاران، تهران: انتشارات سمت و پژوهشگاه مطالعات آموزش و پرورش، چاپ دوم، تابستان.
علی احمدی، علیرضا، مشایخ، محمد رضا.(1393): «تحلیل نظریه سامانه ها از دیدگاه تطبیقی مولوی و کنت بولدینگ میلر»، نشریه علمی-پژوهشی مدیریت فردا، سال سیزدهم، شماره 40.
فتحی واجارگاه، کوروش.( 1393): اصول و مفاهیم اساسی برنامه‌ریزی درسی. تهران: ایران زمین.
فرشاد، مهدی (1362): نگرش سیستمی، تهران، انتشارات امیرکبیر، 1362.
مداح، معصومه و صلواتی سرچشمه، بهرام (1384). هم افزایی تکنولوژیک؛ مدل توسعه و ترکیب منابع در کشورهای در حال توسعه. فصلنامه تخصصی مراکز رشد و فنآوری، ش 3.
مدهوش، محمد جعفر.(1393): سینرژی، adelblogname.mihanblog.com/post/164.
مهرمحمدی، محمود(1393): برنامه درسی به عنوان محصول. دانشنامه ایرانی برنامه درسی.
Aldaihani, Sultan Ghaleb. (2017). Synergy among School and District Leaders in the Application of Quality Standards in Kuwaiti Public Schools. Journal of Education and Practice.
Baker, Laura & Griffin, M. Terri. (2016). A Synergistic Planning Process for Course Design. Academic Exchange Quarterly.
  Bernier, Normand R.; Davis, Richard H. (1973). Synergy: A Model for Implementing Multicultural Education. Journal of Teacher Education.
Bertalanffy, L.v. (1973). General system theory: The Origins of General System Theory.
Buchanan, D. & Huczynski, A. (1997). Organizational behavior, introductory text. Prentice Hall, Third Edition.
Chalmers, I., Hedges, L., & Cooper, H. (2002). A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation and Health Professionals, 25, Pp: 12-37.
Chopra, R. (1990). Synergistic Curriculum Development: An idea whose time has com.Sage. 44-45.
Collins, A.L., Smith, J.A., Haunon, D. P. (2006). Applying a Synergistic Learning Approach in Entrepreneurship Education. Sage publications.
Covey, Stephen. R. (1989, 2017). The 7 habits of highly effective people. Simon&Schuster.
Dale S. Deardorff DM &Greg Williams. 2006. Synergy Leadership in Quantum Organizations. University of DeVry /Keller Graduate School of Management – Naperville, Illinois USA.
De Bono, E. (1999). Lateral thinking: Creativity step by step. New York: Harper & Row.
Eisner, E. W. & Vallance, E. M., & (Eds.). (1974). Conflicting conceptions of curriculum. McCutchan Publishing.
Erdyneeva, G.Klavdiya., Nikolaev, L. Evgeni., Azanova, A. Albina., Nurullina, N. Guzel., Bogdanova, I. Venera., Shaikhlislamov, K.  Albert. Lebedeva, V.  Inessa. Khairullin, R. Elmira. (2016). Upgrading Educational Quality through Synergy of Teaching and Research. International Review of Management and Marketing.
Fuller, R. Buckminster; Applewhite, E. J. (1975). Synergetics. New York: Macmillan. ISBN 0-02-541870-X.
Gaff, J. (2012). General Education and University Curriculum Reform. An International Conference in Hong Kong.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. London: William Heinemann.
Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), Pp: 3-8
Gray, Michael. (2017). Synergize (principles of creative cooperation). www.profitadvisors.com/synergize.shtml
Hatch, J.M., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2013). Organization theory: Modern, Symbolic & Postmodern perspectives. Oxford university press.
Hathib Ahmad Ahmad. (2016).Synergy. Keyi Sahib Training College, Taliparamba. Kannur, Kerala, India.
Henson, K, T. (2015). Curriculum planning: integration multiculturalism, constructivism, and evaluation reform, Amazon Inc. fifth edition.
Heylighen, F., Cilliers, p, & Gershenson, C. (2006). Complexity and Philosophy. Retrieved from http://cogprints.org/4847/.
Hunkins, F.P. (1980) curriculum development: program planning & improvement. Merrill, Columbus, Ohio.
HUTCHINS, Nicole., BISWAS, Gautam ., CONLIN, Luke., EMARA, Mona., GROVER, Shuchi., BASU, Satabdi., & McELHANEY, Kevin. (2018). Studying Synergistic Learning of Physics and Computational Thinking in a Learning by Modeling Environment.  Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computers in Education. Philippines: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Jacobs, H. H. (2002). Getting results with curriculum mapping. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Klein, Frances. M. (1991). The Politics of Curriculum Decision Making: Issues in Centralizing the Curriculum. State University of New York Press (January 22, 1991).
Krajcik, Joe & Delen, Ibrahim. (2017). The Benefits and Limitations of Educative Curriculum Materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education.
Lake, Kathy. (1994). Integrated Curriculum. School Improvement Research Series.
Lasker, D. Roz. Weiss, S. Elisa. Miller, Rebecca (2001). Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. Milbank Q.
Latash, L.M. (2008). Synergy. Oxford university press.
Mascall, B. & Rolheiser, C. (2006).  Pedagogical synergy: Linking assessment, curriculum, and instruction.  Brock Education Journal, 16(1), 45-61.
Mc Bride, M.J., Prayson, A.R. (2008). Development of Synergestic case Based Microanatomy Curriculum. Anat Sci Ed1: 102-105.
Muniandy, Balakrishnan. Mohammad, Rossafri. Fong, Soon Fook. (2007). synergizing pedagogy, learning theory and technology in instruction: How can it be done? US-China Education Review, ISSN1548-6613, USA.
McNeill, Katherine L. and Krajcik, Joseph(2009)'Synergy Between Teacher Practices and Curricular Scaffolds toSupport Students in Using Domain-Specific and Domain-General Knowledge in Writing Arguments to Explain Phenomena',Journal ofthe Learning Sciences,18:3,416 — 460.
Newmann, F., King, B., & Youngs, P. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108, 259-99.
Null, W. (2011). Curriculum: From theory to practice. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Offorma, Grace Chibiko. (2016). Integrating components of culture in curriculum Planning. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction 8(1).
Ornstein, A.C., & Hunkins, F.P. (2009). Curriculum: Foundations, principles and Issues   (5th Ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Partridge, E. (1973). Synergistic Education: Will it make a difference? Counseling and Values.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning company. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Smith, mike. (2005). ‘Elliot W. Eisner, connoisseurship, criticism and the art of education’, the encyclopaedia of informal education.
Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to Emerging Patterns of Distributed Scaffolding. The journal of the learning science, 13(3). 305-335.
Taba, H. 1962. Curriculum development: theory and practice. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Tyler, R.W. (1949) Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Warren, Nick. (1989). Synergistic Education. Delicate Balance: Technics, Culture and Consequences.
Wlodkowski, J. Raymond. (1973). Conseling & motivation in synergistic curriculum. Counseling & values.
Young, J. H. (1988). Teacher participation in curriculum development: What status does it have? Journal of Curriculum and Supervision.
Zhu Z., Wang Y., Luo H. (2008) Synergistic Learning for Knowledge Age: Theoretical Model, Enabling Technology and Analytical Framework. In: Leung H., Li F., Lau R., Li Q. (Eds) Advances in Web Based Learning – ICWL 2007. ICWL 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4823. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Ziegenfuss, H.D. (2016). Closing the Loop: Building Synergy for Learning through a Professional Development MOOC about Flipped Teaching. University of Utah.