نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه تربیت و مشاوره، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشگاه آزاد تهران مرکزی
3 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The purpose of this study was to investigate the status of ethnicity and lived ethnic experiences of junior school students in the formal-hidden curriculum of Iran's academic year in 2019-2020.The research method in the first part of documentary analysis and qualitative content analysis with 3 volumes of social studies book including 553 pages.Content Analysis Unit;Text-Images and activities.The second part of the qualitative and phenomenological research method was purposeful sampling of participants including 30 students (persian-Azeri-Kurd-Lor-gilak) and 20 teachers.Student journal and informal interview were also used. Findings show that only 6% of the three sections of the examined content pay attention to the desirable components of ethnicity, which is very undesirable in the formal curriculum.In the analysis of information,cultural assimilation, superficial thoughts about ethnic culture, educational inequality, cultural diversity alienism,neglect of peaceful coexistence appeared, overall, it can be acknowledged that the position of ethnicity in the hidden curriculum was not desirable
کلیدواژهها [English]
Banks J (2006). Multicultural Education For Young Childeren: Racial and Ethnic Attitudes and Their Modification. In D.Spodek (ed.). Handbook of Research on the Education of Young Children; 236-250. New York:Macmillan.
Banks J ( 2013). The Construction and Historical Development of v Multicultural Educatio, 1962-2012, Theory into Practice; 52(1): 73-82.
Banks J A, Banks C A M (2010). Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives (7 th ed.).Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Banks, J. A. & Banks, C. A. M., (2005). Multicultural education Issues and perspectives (5th ed.), New York: John Wiley.
Brown L (2013). An Immigration Histoty of Britain: Multicultural Racism since 1800, by Panikos Panayi. English Historical Review ; 128: 225-227.
Fernandez, M.(2010).The Responsibilty for Multicultural education An Ethics of teaching and learning . Available at:http://www.Scu.edu/ethics.
Gay G (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, reaserch, and Practice (2 ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Glock, S., Kleen, H (2021) . The role of preservice teachers’ implicit attitudes and causal attributions: a deeper look into students’ ethnicity. Curr Psychol.
Grant C A, Sleeter C E (2008). Turning on Learning: Five approaches for Multicultural teaching plans for race, class, gender, and disability. Columbus. OH: Merrill.
Griffin J (2019). Marshall Mcluhan was Right: The Medium is the Message, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Gorski P (2008). Good Intentions Are Not Enough: A Decolonizing Intercultural Education. 19.
Hjerm M (2018). How critical thinking, Multicultural education and teacher qualification affect anti-immigrant attitudes, Inernational Studies in Sociology of Education; 27(1): 42-59.
Holm, G., Londen, M. (2010). The discourse on multicultural education in Finland: education for whom?, Intercultural Education.
Ksinan, A. J., Vazsonyi, A. T., Ksinan Jiskrova, G., & Peugh, J. L. (2019). National ethnic and racial disparities in disciplinary practices: A contextual analysis in American secondary schools. Journal of school psychology, 74, 106–125.
Malewski, E (2010) Curriculum Studies Handbook – The Next Moment. NY: Routledge
Parekh, B. (2008). The Concept of Multicultural education. In S. Modgil, G K. Verma, K. Mallick. & C.Modgil (Eds.). Multicultural education: The Interminable Debate (pp. 19-31).
Pinar, W. F. (2015). Educational experience as Lived: Knowledge, history, alterity (The selected works of William F.pinar). New York, NY: Rutledge.
Rata E (2017). Connecting Knowledge to Democracy. In B. Barrett, U. Hoadley, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Knowledge, curriculum and equity: social realist Perspectives; 19-32. Abingdon & New York: Routlrdge.
)