Theory and Practice in the Curriculum

Theory and Practice in the Curriculum

Transition from Centralized Governance to Participatory Innovation in Textbook Production: A Comparative Analysis of Institutional Arrangements

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Educational Sciences, Shahid Chamran Campus, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Ph.D. Student Curriculum studies, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
This study conducts a comparative analysis of the processes and institutional structures underlying the development of school textbooks in ten selected countries—Iran, Finland, Sweden, Japan, South Korea, France, the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, and Singapore—based on Brady’s four-stage model and centered on sixteen key indicators (eight process-related and eight institutional). Employing a comparative document analysis method, the research population encompasses the systems of textbook production and governance in these countries, with purposive sampling applied. Data were collected through the examination of reports, educational policies, and prior studies, and analyzed via content analysis across four comparative analytical tables. Findings reveal that, in terms of process indicators, Finland, Sweden, and Australia have fostered dynamic and innovative textbook development through decentralization, broad teacher participation, and continuous feedback. In contrast, Iran, South Korea, France, and to some extent Singapore, constrained by centralized state control and weak feedback cycles, face slow updates and limited innovation. Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom, through hybrid models, localized content, and multilayered evaluation, achieve a relative balance between coherence and innovation. Regarding institutional indicators, Iran and France, with vertically structured state systems, demonstrate less flexibility, whereas Finland, Sweden, and the United States, by strengthening independent institutions and the private sector, exhibit greater diversity and dynamism. The study underscores the importance of decentralization, teacher participation, and institutional diversity in enhancing the quality and innovation of school textbooks.
Keywords
Subjects

Aspinall, R., & McLaughlin, J. (2025). The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Handbook of Japanese Public Administration and Bureaucracy, 305.‏
Ball, S. J. (2012). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in sociology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203808726
Banks, J. A. & McGee Banks, C. A. (2019). Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives (10th Ed.). Wiley.
Bereday, G. Z. (1964). Comparative Method in Education [by] George ZF Bereday. Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.). (2014). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (2nd ed.). Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05594-7
Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority Act 2008 (No. 136, 2008). Federal Register of Legislation. https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2008A00136/latest
Department for Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England: Framework document. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4
du Plessis, L., Tom, N., & du Plessis, Y. (2025). On the Importance of Cultural Intelligence in Higher Education Leadership: Through the Lens of Neo-institutionalism. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-788-320251023
Ebraaheem Kaafooree, A. (2010). An instrument for evaluating text books: construction and validation. Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 6(4), 61-92. doi: 10.22051/jontoe.2010.218 [in Persian]
Eurydice - European Commission. (2026). Teaching and learning in single-structure education: Sweden. European Education and Culture Executive Agency. https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/eurypedia/sweden/teaching-and-learning-single-structure-education
Eurydice. (2023). Organisation and governance. European Commission.Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.‏
Gouëdard, P., Pont, B., Hyttinen, S., & Huang, P. (2020). Curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/efe8a48c-en
Government of South Korea. (2015). Regulations on the curriculum books (Presidential Decree No. 26709). Korea Law Translation Center. https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_service/lawViewContent.do?hseq=37171
Harris‐Hart, C. (2010). National curriculum and federalism: The Australian experience. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 42(3), 295-313.‏
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.
İdil, Ş., Gülen, S., & Dönmez, İ. (2024). What should we understand from PISA 2022 results?. Journal of STEAM Education, 7(1), 1-9.‏
Iswadi, I., Iriansyah, H. S., Tamzil, F., Sari, S., & Saridin, R. B. (2025). Global insights for national reform: A comparative review of education management in Finland, Japan, Singapore, and the United States. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 15(3), 1930–1952. DOI: 10.23960/jpp.v15i3.pp1930-1952
Journal Officiel de la République Française. (2019). LOI n° 2019-791 du 26 juillet 2019 pour une école de la confiance (pp. 1–15). https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000038829065
Kim, Y. C., & Yoon, S. (2009). A constitutional review on the official approval/certification system of textbooks in Korea - Focused on educational system and rights. World Constitutional Law Review, 15(2), 203-228.
Lavonen, J. (2020). Curriculum and Teacher Education Reforms in Finland That Support the Development of Competences for the Twenty-First Century. In: Reimers, F.M. (eds) Audacious Education Purposes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41882-3_3
Lee, Y. J., & Ho, J. (2022). Basic education in Singapore. In International Handbook on Education in Southeast Asia (pp. 977-1001). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.‏
Liesbet, H. O. O. G. H. E., & Gary, M. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American political science review, 97(2), 233-243.‏
MacGill, B. (2022). The Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority (ACARA)—holding responsibility: the arts curriculum and the cross-curriculum priorities. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(2), 185-189.‏
Motamedi, E. (2012). A Survey on the History of Textbooks Developments in Iran (1851-2011AD), Journal of Research and Writing Academic Books, 16(1), 111. [in Persian]
Niknafs, S., & Aliabadi, K. (2013). Content Analysis and Its Role in Educational Process and in Designing Textbooks. Global Media Journal-Persian Edition, 8(16), 117-143. [in Persian]
OECD (2023), OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en.  
OECD. (2018). Education policy in Japan: Building bridges towards 2030 (Reviews of National Policies for Education). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264302402-en
Phillips, D., & Schweisfurth, M. (2014). Comparative and international education: An introduction to theory, method, and practice. A&C Black.‏
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American political science review, 94(2), 251-267.‏
Pingel, F. (2010). UNESCO guidebook on textbook research and textbook revision. Unesco.‏
Reimers, F. M. (Ed.). (2020). Audacious education purposes: How governments transform the goals of education systems. Springer Open. http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/37709
Saeidi, A. (2022). A Comparative Study of Textbook Writing Process in Iran and South Korea, Singapore, Japan, Turkey and USA. Educational and Scholastic studies, 11(2), 69-101. Doi: 20.1001.1.2423494.1401.11.2.3.7 [in Persian]
Safonov, Y., Bazhenkov, I., & Zaiets, S. (2023). Publishing school textbooks: International policy and practical scenarios. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 9(2), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-2-172-180
Sahlberg, P. (2021). Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland?. Teachers College Press.‏
Sazman-e Pazhuhesh va Barnamehrizi-ye Amuzeshi. (2012). The national curriculum of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Ministry of Education. [in Persian]
Skolverket, S. (2022). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet LGR22. Swedish National Agency for Education, National Curriculum.‏
Smart, A., & Jagannathan, S. (2018). Textbook policies in Asia: Development, publishing, printing, distribution, and future implications. Asian Development Bank. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TCS189651-2
So, K. (2020). Whom is the national curriculum for? Politics in the national curriculum system of South Korea. In Handbook of Education Policy Studies: School/University, Curriculum, and Assessment, Volume 2 (pp. 165-184). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.‏
Tabatabai, M. S. , Momeni Mahmouei, H. , Akbari, A. and Falah Mahneh, T. (2025). The Current Model for Authoring Textbooks and Electronic Books in Iran’s Education System. Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 21(1), 125-139. doi: 10.22051/jontoe.2023.42440.3709 [in Persian]
U.S. Department of Education. (2025). Education: Whose job is it? Office of Communications and Outreach. https://www.ed.gov/about/homeroom-blog/education-whose-job-it
UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022. https://doi.org/10.54676/RCZB6329
UNESCO. (2023). Guidelines for transforming education. UNESCO.
Vahtivuori-Hänninen, S., Halinen, I., Niemi, H., Lavonen, J., & Lipponen, L. (2014). A new Finnish national core curriculum for basic education (2014) and technology as an integrated tool for learning. In Finnish innovations and technologies in schools: A guide towards new ecosystems of learning (pp. 21-32). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.‏
Yasbolaghisharahi, B. (2022). Rereading the ratio of two language backgrounds (standard language and mother tongue) in education based on lived experience of primary teachers. Theory and Practice in the Curriculum, 10(20), 129-170. [in Persian]
You, J., Lee, H., & Craig, C. J. (2019). Remaking textbook policy: analysis of national curriculum alignment in Korean school textbooks. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(1), 14-30.‏
Ziebell, N., & Skeat, J. (2020). Evidence-based Reasoning Processes in Education: A Model to Support Interventionist Practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3).